Blog · July 8, 2026

How Much Does SOC 2 Cost? Breaking Down the Real Expenses

SOC 2 costs vary widely. Learn the real components: auditor fees, tooling, engineering time, and maintenance, plus how self-hosted readiness tools reduce costs.

SOC 2 compliance is not a single purchase. It is a collection of costs spread across four areas: the audit itself, the tooling to gather evidence, the engineering effort to build and maintain controls, and the ongoing work to stay compliant. Understanding each one helps you budget realistically and identify where you can optimize.

The biggest cost: the auditor

The SOC 2 audit is the single largest expense for most companies, and the fee varies dramatically based on the scope and complexity of your environment.

A Type I audit (a point-in-time snapshot of your controls) for a small, straightforward business typically costs between $15,000 and $30,000. Type I is faster and cheaper because the auditor only needs to test controls at a single moment, not over a period of time.

A Type II audit (testing controls over a minimum six-month period) is more expensive and more valuable to customers. Expect $25,000 to $75,000 or higher, depending on the size of your organization, the number of systems in scope, and the complexity of your infrastructure. A startup with a handful of AWS services and a small team will be on the lower end. A mid-market SaaS company with multiple cloud providers, on-premises infrastructure, and dozens of employees will be on the higher end.

What drives auditor costs up?

• Scope. The more systems, cloud providers, and business units in scope, the more testing the auditor must do.
• Documentation quality. If your evidence is disorganized or incomplete, the auditor spends more time hunting for what they need. Well-organized, complete evidence can reduce audit hours.
• Control maturity. If controls are ad hoc or poorly documented, the auditor must spend time understanding and testing them. Mature, well-documented controls are faster to audit.
• Auditor firm size. Big-name firms charge more than boutique practices. A Big Four firm will cost significantly more than a regional CPA firm.
• Timeline. If you need the audit done in a compressed timeframe, expect rush fees.

Tooling: the second major cost

Compliance tooling helps you gather evidence, track controls, and prepare for the audit. This is where costs vary most widely, and where self-hosted readiness tools can make a real difference.

SaaS compliance platforms (the Vanta, Drata, Secureframe category) typically cost $1,500 to $5,000 per month, depending on the tier and the number of integrations you need. These platforms automate evidence collection from your cloud providers, identity systems, and other tools, then organize it for the auditor. They are convenient and require minimal engineering effort to set up, but they are ongoing monthly costs that add up quickly. Over a year, a mid-tier SaaS platform can cost $20,000 to $60,000.

Self-hosted readiness tooling (like Scorifya Controls) is a one-time or annual license fee rather than a recurring monthly subscription. You run it on your own infrastructure, and it generates the same kind of evidence: a list of controls, their status, and audit-ready reports. The upfront cost is lower than a year of SaaS platform fees, and there is no per-seat charge. For a small to mid-market company, a self-hosted tool can cost $2,000 to $10,000 annually, a fraction of what a SaaS platform costs over the same period. The tradeoff is that you are responsible for running and maintaining the tool yourself.

Custom or minimal tooling. Some companies build their own evidence-gathering scripts or use spreadsheets and Google Docs. This has near-zero software cost but requires significant engineering time to build and maintain.

What drives tooling costs up or down?

• Automation level. Fully automated evidence collection (SaaS platforms) costs more upfront but saves engineering time. Manual or semi-automated approaches cost less in software but more in labor.
• Number of integrations. If you use many cloud providers, SaaS platforms, and identity systems, a platform that integrates with all of them is more valuable and often more expensive.
• Hosting preference. SaaS is hands-off but recurring. Self-hosted is a one-time or annual cost but requires you to run it.
• Scope of controls. Tracking 20 controls is simpler than tracking 200. Larger scope often means a more capable (and more expensive) tool.

Engineering time: the hidden cost

Building and documenting controls takes engineering effort, and that effort is often underestimated.

For a small startup with a simple architecture and a handful of controls, this might be 40 to 80 hours of engineering time: writing policies, documenting procedures, setting up logging and monitoring, and creating evidence artifacts. At a typical loaded cost of $100 to $200 per hour, that is $4,000 to $16,000.

For a mid-market company with a complex infrastructure and many controls, the effort can be 200 to 500 hours or more. That is $20,000 to $100,000 in engineering time.

What drives engineering time up or down?

• Architecture complexity. A simple, well-documented architecture is faster to audit-ready than a sprawling one with legacy systems and unclear boundaries.
• Existing documentation. If you already have runbooks, architecture diagrams, and incident response procedures, you are ahead. If you are starting from scratch, expect more work.
• Control maturity. If your team already follows disciplined practices (code review, change management, access controls), documenting them is faster than building them from scratch.
• Tooling choice. A self-hosted readiness tool that auto-discovers controls and generates reports can reduce the manual documentation burden. A spreadsheet-based approach requires more manual work.

Ongoing maintenance and re-audit

SOC 2 is not a one-time project. You must maintain your controls and re-audit periodically.

Annual or biennial re-audits cost roughly the same as the initial audit, sometimes slightly less if the scope and complexity stay stable. Budget $20,000 to $75,000 every one to two years.

Ongoing tooling and engineering to keep controls working and evidence current is continuous. If you use a SaaS platform, you pay the monthly fee indefinitely. If you use a self-hosted tool, you pay the annual license and budget engineering time for updates and maintenance. If you use spreadsheets, someone on your team spends time each month or quarter updating evidence.

Staff time to manage compliance is often overlooked. Someone on your team (often a security or operations person) must own the compliance program, track control status, coordinate with the auditor, and ensure evidence is current. Budget 5 to 20 hours per month depending on the size and complexity of your organization.

Putting it together: a rough total cost of ownership

For a small startup (simple architecture, 10 to 20 controls, Type I audit):

• Auditor: $15,000 to $30,000
• Tooling (self-hosted): $2,000 to $5,000
• Engineering time: $4,000 to $16,000
• Ongoing (annual): $2,000 to $5,000 tooling plus staff time
• Total first year: $23,000 to $56,000

For a mid-market company (complex infrastructure, 50+ controls, Type II audit):

• Auditor: $40,000 to $75,000
• Tooling (SaaS platform): $20,000 to $60,000 annually
• Engineering time: $30,000 to $100,000
• Ongoing (annual): $20,000 to $60,000 tooling plus staff time
• Total first year: $110,000 to $295,000

These ranges are wide because every organization is different. Your actual cost depends on your architecture, your team's existing practices, your tooling choices, and the auditor you select.

How to optimize

If cost is a concern, focus on these levers:

• Start with Type I. It is cheaper and faster. You can move to Type II later if your customers require it.
• Use a self-hosted readiness tool. The upfront cost is lower than a year of SaaS platform fees, and you own the tool.
• Automate evidence collection. The more you can automate (logging, monitoring, policy enforcement), the less manual work is needed at audit time.
• Build controls incrementally. You do not need all 28 controls on day one. Start with the most critical ones and expand over time.
• Choose a smaller, regional auditor. Big-name firms charge premium rates. A competent regional CPA firm can be significantly cheaper.

SOC 2 is an investment in trust and customer confidence, not a compliance checkbox. Understanding the real costs helps you budget smartly and make informed choices about where to invest.

Try a scan on scorifya.com, read how we score, or see Pro for unlimited scans and exports.